![]() I'm trying to suggest that they may not be claiming that, but instead claiming that "training in one task will make you better on average." What you're saying is right: training in one task won't make you better in other tasks. There's also a reasonable argument that "everywhere" is colloquially close enough to "overall", and I think that's the problem here. I think there's a mismatch between what people think the apps are claiming and what the app makers are attempting to claim, maybe even what they're legally able to claim.īecoming better at one trait, and not regressing in any other traits, is improving your aggregate measures.Ī reasonable argument can be made that "aggregate" is colloquially close enough to "overall". If there's X dimensions for your memory, and you improve one of those dimensions and not regressed in any other, then you have improved the sum and average of your memory dimensions. I think his point is "just because it trained your memory for numbers, that doesn't mean it improved your memory overall, as these apps tend to claim." ![]() If you're confronted with other situations that requires quick reactions, your brain probably won't connect clicking birds on a screen with something like dodging balls in the real wold. If you train with games that have such simple premises as "Click the bird as it appears on the screen, quicker is better!" You aren't training your reaction times in general, you are priming yourself to react to something that happens in that specific situation. Then comes the piano specific parts like how to make certain sounds with a piano by pressing keys and pedals.īrain Training games are the same. Then they'd learn how the sheet music relates to musical notes, meaning as long as this remains the same for other instruments, they could play sheet music with that instrument. This means that any sheet music they are given they can read it. They must first learn to read sheet music. You couldn't even ask them to play the same song that they just learned by reading the sheet music of that song.Ī piano player will learn a huge range of tasks that can potentially help other related skills in turn. But learning to play that one song very well does not lend itself to actually learning to play the piano, it's merely teaching them a sequence of steps to complete a very specific goal. You could potentially train any person to play one song very well by teaching them one action at a time, i.e "press this key down, then that key". I feel like it's easier to understand why this is by considering a piano player vs someone who has never touched a piano. New to reddit? Click here! Get flair in /r/science Previous Science AMA's Repeat or flagrant offenders will be banned.Comments dismissing established findings and fields of science must provide evidence.Criticism of published work should assume basic competence of the researchers and reviewers.Non-professional personal anecdotes will be removed.No off-topic comments, memes, low-effort comments or jokes. ![]() All submissions must have flair assigned.No blogspam, images, videos, or infographics.Research must be less than 6 months old.No editorialized, sensationalized, or biased titles.No summaries of summaries, re-hosted press releases, or reposts.Directly link to published peer-reviewed research or media summary.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |